As the
earth’s population continues to grow, so does the need for housing, which stirs
up new ideas and innovations. In the United
States in 1993, a specified Congress was founded for New Urbanism, a
neighborhood development that embodies the traditional “suburban sprawl model,”
subdivisons, shopping centers, paved roads, etc., which claims to conserve the
environment. Unfortunately this
development is merging into agricultural areas, putting our natural resources
and farmland at risk. The solution to
this is New Ruralism and the two movements within in it: smart growth and
sustainable agriculture (Stratton).
Smart
growth is a movement in which cities are organized around small neighborhoods,
instead of the sprawl of New Urbanism. By
compacting cities and neighborhoods, we can preserve and enhance the
environment. According to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, the ten basic principles of smart growth are as follows:
- “Mix land uses”
- “Take advantage of compact building design”
- “Create a range of housing opportunities and choices”
- “Create walkable neighborhoods”
- “Foster distinctive, attractive communities with a strong sense of place”
- “Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas”
- “Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities”
- “Provide a variety of transportation choices”
- “Make development decisions predictable, fair, and cost effective”
- “Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration in development decisions”
Not only are these
principles, but they are simply advantages New Ruralism has over New Urbanism. A prime and ironic example of smart growth is
New York City, New York. Although this
city “generates [the most] greenhouse gases, uses [the most] energy, and
produces [the most]… waste” more than any other city in America, it actually is
one of the most environmentally conservative cities when how many people that
live there are taken into account. This
is due to the city’s compression; because everyone and everything is so compacted
together, “New Yorkers… drive, pollute, consume, and throw away much less than
the surrounding suburbs” (Heitman). Of
course, New York City doesn’t pay much attention to agriculture.
Sustainable
agriculture is a trend in which food is developed to encourage “environmental
health and socio-economic equality” (Stratton).
According to GRACE Communications Foundation, the primary benefits of
sustainable agriculture are “environmental preservation, protection of public
health, sustaining vibrant communities, and upholding animal welfare.” Forward,
a new agricultural market and movement in Canada, hopes to succeed by making
Canada a world leader in “agricultural, nutritional, health, energy, and environmental”
issues by creating new products and solutions.
For example, in order to preserve the environment, new techniques, such
as crop rotation, can be used instead of lethal chemical fertilizers. Thus, this simply results in the protection
of public and animal health, because hazardous fertilizers and pesticides are
avoided and replaced with these new products and techniques.
Thankfully there is a
city that has combined smart growth and sustainable agriculture, thriving as a
New Ruralistic community. During my
adolescent years, I had the pleasure of growing up in South Georgia, near Serenbe,
a New Ruralistic community in South Fulton County. Strangely, a friend of mine moved to Serenbe
at the same time my mom began a job there in the winery and restaurant; I was
utterly confused that you could live and work in the same place, but it wasn’t
a town. I now know it is because it was
a sustainable community. It includes
pastures, farms, retail shops, homes, restaurants, its own wastewater treatment
plant and much more into a small, but large enough area that it forms its own
community (think Stepford but less creepy!)
Like New York City, Serenbe has walkways all throughout its 900-acres,
so walking is more efficient than driving.
The most important factor of Serenbe, and why it thrives as a New
Ruralistic community, is “the surrounding area is dedicated to preservation”
(Stratton).
It is strange to me
that New Urbanism claims to be conservative of the natural environment as it
encroaches upon our already agricultural and naturally environmental
areas. With all the hype about global
warming these days, you’d think New Ruralism would be the obvious choice over
New Urbanism. The two key components to
New Ruralism, smart growth and sustainable agriculture, directly and positively
affect the envrironment. Serenbe, an exceptional
example of New Ruralism, is thriving tremendously. It would be a slow transition from sprawl to smart growth, but it is one that should and needs to happen.
Works Cited
GRACE Communications Foundation. "Sustainable Agriculture- The Basics GRACE Communications Foundation." Gracelinks.org. GRACE Communications Foundation, 2013. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.
Fixter, Kristina. "Canada’s Plant Science Industry Supports Growing
Forward the Federal, Provincial, Territorial Governments’ New Vision for
Agriculture." CropLife.ca. CropLife Canada, 03 July 2007. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.
Heitman, Danny. "Green Metropolis." The Christian Science Monitor. The Christian Science Monitor, 16 Sept. 2009. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.
Stratton, Emily M.
"New Ruralism." University of Georgia Land Use Clinic (2009):
n. pag. University of Georgia School of Law and School of Ecology, Fall 2009.
Web. 2 Feb. 2013.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. "About Smart Growth." Epa.gov. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 28 June 2006. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment